Richburg

Richburg v. Department of the Treasury

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20214:21-cv-05057California1,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEON RICHBURG, Case No. 21-cv-05057-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner in Maryland, proceeds with a pro se civil action against a governmental entity. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. 3. DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.