Clarke
Clarke v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAN CLARKE, Case No. 20-cv-04629-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON SECOND DISCOVERY
v. DISPUTE
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 52 et al., 11 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff Dan Clarke and defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corporation (collectively “PG&E”) have submitted a joint letter to resolve a dispute concerning Clarke’s Notice of Deposition of PG&E (the “Notice”). The parties dispute PG&E’s objections and responses to three categories of information. Second Discovery Dispute Letter [Dkt. No. 52]. I address each in turn. Category No. 3: This category pertains to “Equitable’s use of the Cannery MGP and Cannery MGP Site, including without limitation activities related to the generation, transport, storage, and/or handling of manufactured gas and Waste.” Ex. A (PG&E Objections to Clarke’s Notice of Deposition at 3–4). Equitable is the entity that operated the Cannery MGP from approximately 1898 to 1903…