Love
Love v. Royal Pacific Motel
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAMUEL LOVE,
Case No. 20-cv-07308-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
ROYAL PACIFIC MOTEL, COMPLAINT
10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 20
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Samuel Love brings this action against Defendant Royal Pacific Motel (“RPM”), which operates a hotel in San Francisco. Love alleges that RPM’s reservation website does not reasonably identify and describe accessible features of the hotel, in violation of federal and California law. Love alleges that this failure prevents individuals with disabilities from assessing whether the hotel meets their accessibility needs. RPM brings a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (“Motion”) for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds the Motion is suitable for determination without oral argument and therefore vacates the Motion hearing set for…