Batjer

National Lifeline Association v. Batjer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20213:20-cv-08312California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 NATIONAL LIFELINE ASSOCIATION, Case No. 20-cv-08312-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION,

AMENDMENT, AND STAY

MARYBEL BATJER, et al.,

Defendants.

9 Before the Court is defendants Marybel Batjer, Clifford Rechtschaffen, Martha Guzman Aceves, Genevieve Shiroma, and Darcie Houck's (hereinafter, "CPUC Commissioners") "Motion for Clarification or Amendment of Order Issuing Injunction (ECF 34) and Judgment (ECF 35) and Temporary Stay," filed June 2, 2021. Plaintiff National Lifeline Association ("NaLA") has filed opposition, to which CPUC Commissioners have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court hereby DENIES the motion, as follows:1 1. To the extent CPUC Commissioners seek, pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, clarification of the Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.