Marani
Marani v. Cramer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVEN MARANI, CASE No. 19-cv-05538-YGR Plaintiff, Vs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 47 MICHAEL CRAMER, ET AL., Defendants. 10 Defendants Mark, Florence, and Scott Cramer (“Cramer Defendants”) filed a motion to 12 || dismiss plaintiff Keven Marani’s complaint on April 2, 2021. (Dkt. No. 47.) The motion was || heard by the Court on July 6, 2021 by videoconference. Having carefully considered the briefing and arguments submitted in this matter, and for the reasons set forth in full detail on the record, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED WITH LEAVE || TOAMEND. The Court finds that Plaintiff has not made a prima facie showing that this Court has 17 || personal jurisdiction over the Cramer Defendants. For a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, that defendant must have “minimum contacts with [the forum state] || such that the maintenance of…