Doe

Doe v. San Jose Unified School District Board

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20214:20-cv-02798California4,978 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ELIZABETH SINCLAIR, et al., Case No. 20-CV-02798-LHK

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT AND DENYING AS

MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS

SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

BOARD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55, 61 Defendants.

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes (“FCA”) and two of its former student members, Elizabeth Sinclair and Charlotte Klarke (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), allege that officials acting on behalf of the San Jose Unified School District (“Defendants”) discriminated against Plaintiffs’ religious viewpoint and unlawfully derecognized FCA’s student groups. Before the Court are two related motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint and thus to file the Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 55 (“Motion” or “Mot.”); and (2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, ECF No. 61.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.