Hart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

> Case No.:21-CV-2653-YGR ‘ KRISTIN HART, ET AL., Plaintiffs ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AS MOOT vs. Re: Dkt. No. 15 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, ET AL., Defendants. 10 Defendants move for a more definite statement from plaintiffs regarding their sixth cause of |/action for negligent infliction of emotional distress.! Defendants contend that they “cannot frame a ° = responsive pleading because the nature of the claim that [p]laintiffs are pursuing is uncertain”: 0 ||negligent infliction of emotional distress, as the cause of action is labeled, or intentional infliction □□ emotional distress, as suggested by the use of the words “reckless disregard” and “intentional” || within the relevant allegations. (Dkt. No. 15 at 2 (citing Complaint 4] 52—56).) In light of plaintiffs’ opposition brief confirming that they are pleading a cause…