In re Sundrea Gordon

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20213:21-cv-00643California5,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SUNDREA GORDON, Case No. 21-cv-00643-WHO

Debtor/Appellant,

ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

v.

MARTHA G. BRONITSKY, Trustee/Appellee.

12 This is an appeal from a bankruptcy court order denying confirmation of appellant Sundrea Gordon’s chapter 13 plan, which allegedly contained a provision that did not comply with this District’s bankruptcy General Order 34, and an appeal from the court’s subsequent order granting confirmation of her plan once she corrected that provision. General Order 34 requires debtors to submit quarterly declarations and documentary proof of making direct (non-conduit) payments in accordance with their plans. Appellee, the chapter 13 Trustee, claims that the bankruptcy court correctly upheld the validity of the reporting requirements imposed by General Order 34. General Order 34 provides a procedural process for enforcing rights and obligations and does “not abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2075. It is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.