Kapoor

Kapoor v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20215:21-cv-01961California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SHREYA KAPOOR, YASH PAL GARG, Case No. 21-cv-01961-BLF and REVA GARG, 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S v. ANSWER 11 ANTONY BLINKEN, [Re: ECF 13] 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff Shreya Kapoor and her parents, Plaintiffs Yash and Reva Garg, seek to compel Defendant Antony Blinken to adjudicate the immigrant visa applications of Plaintiffs Yash and Reva Garg. See Petition, ECF 1. They filed the present action on March 19, 2021, and Defendant timely answered on May 25, 2021. See id; Answer, ECF 12. Plaintiffs move to strike Defendant’s answer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). See Mot. to Strike, ECF 13. Defendant filed opposition to the motion on June 29, 2021. See Opp., ECF 15. Plaintiffs did not file a reply and the time to do so has elapsed. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(c). The Court has vacated the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.