Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20214:19-cv-00054California1,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALEC OTTO, Case No. 4:19-cv-00054-YGR Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW MOTION FOR CLASS

v. CERTIFICATION AND MOTION FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

COLIN LEMAHIEU, ET AL., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 194 11 Plaintiff Alec Otto brings this putative class action against defendants Nano f/k/a/ RaiBlocks f/k/a Hieusys, LLC (“Nano”), Colin LeMahieu, Mica Busch, Zack Shapiro, and Troy Retzer (collectively, “Nano Defendants”) as well as B.G. Services SRL f/k/a BitGrail SRL f/k/a Webcoin Solutions (“BitGrail”) and Francesco “The Bomber” Firano (collectively “BitGrail Defendants”) for securities fraud and related claims in connection with defendants’ promotion of and statements regarding a cryptocurrency or digital asset referred to as NANO f/k/a RaiBlocks (“XRB” or “Nano Tokens”). Now before the Court is plaintiff’s notice of withdrawal of plaintiff’s motion for class certification and motion for voluntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.