Meniooh

Meniooh v. Two Jinn, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20213:21-cv-02840California3,689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

I. Facts re Allegations Against Judicial Defendants

9 Plaintiff Rah-Tah Meniooh is an African American/Aborigine. Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 110. Plaintiff 10 alleges the following causes of action against the Judicial Defendants: 11 - Claim 2: § 1983 – Racial Discrimination in Violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 12 Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶¶108-119) 13 - Claim 3: Violation of § 1983 – Deliberate Indifferent Policies, Practices, Customs, Training, 14 and Supervision in violation of the Fourth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments in violation 15 of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶¶ 120-135). 16 - Claim 4: Violation of §1983 – Right to Procedural Due Process of Law in violation of the 17 Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment: ART. 1 sect (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶¶ 136 – 144). 18 - Claim 5: § 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶¶ 145-153) 19 - Claim 6: Violation of §1983 – Excessive Bail, Cruel and unusual punishment in violation 20 of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment: ART 1 sect. 7 (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶¶ 154-161) 21 - Claim 7: Declaratory Relief1 22 Plaintiff’s allegations against the Judicial Defendants arise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.