In re HIV Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20213:19-cv-02573California2,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STALEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants Docket No. 632

12 13 Defendants have filed a motion seeking relief from Judge Beeler’s discovery order of June 18, 2021. See Docket No. 624 (order). In the order, Judge Beeler held that Plaintiffs1 did not have to respond to certain interrogatories propounded by Defendants. Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND At issue is whether Plaintiffs should be compelled to provide responses to the following interrogatories: • Interrogatory No. 1(l): Identify each and every purchase by You of cART Products, including: . . . (l) Whether Your purchase of each cART Product was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.