Piercy

Johnson v. Piercy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20215:20-cv-07591California349 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 5:20-cv-07591-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED

WILLIAM MARK PIERCY, Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed the present action on October 29, 2020. Dkt. No. 1. On May 27, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s administrative motion for relief seeking an order requiring Defendant William Piercy to provide dates of availability to conduct the settlement meeting required under General Order 56. Dkt. No. 16. The Court ordered the parties to conduct a settlement meeting by June 30, 2021 and Plaintiff to file a notice of need for mediation no later than 7 days after the parties’ settlement meeting. Plaintiff did not file a notice of need for mediation by July 7, 2021, the latest possible date he could have done so. Neither party has taken any action in this case since the Court’s May 27 order. The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.