In re HIV Antitrust Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STALEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING END-PAYOR

v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF

FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. Docket No. 629

12 13 Plaintiffs1 have filed a motion seeking relief from Judge Beeler’s discovery orders of May 21 and June 14, 2021. See Docket Nos. 590, 623 (orders). In the orders, Judge Beeler found that Janssen had properly asserted the attorney-client privilege as to certain documents (or rather, certain portions of those documents). Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, including but not limited to the documents at issue (copies of which were provided by Janssen for in camera review), the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion.3 20 21

23 1 “Plaintiffs” as used herein refers to the end-payor plaintiffs only.

24 2 After Judge Beeler issued her orders, Janssen withdrew its…