Moore

Moore v. DNATA US INFLIGHT CATERING LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20213:20-cv-08028California2,828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTIAN L. MOORE, Case No. 20-cv-08028-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE REMAND

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 13 DNATA US INFLIGHT CATERING LLC, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Moore, on behalf of himself and a putative class of current and former employees, sued defendant Dnata US Inflight Catering LLC for a variety of wage and hour claims under California state law. Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A. The complaint was originally filed in the San Francisco Superior Court, and was removed by dnata1 under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), and alternatively on federal question subject matter jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441(a). A federal question is said to arise from the complete preemption of the state law employment claims by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), and the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. Dkt. No. 1. Moore has asked to remand the case. Dkt. No. 13. For CAFA, Moore says that dnata has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.