Davis

Davis v. Pinterest, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20214:19-cv-07650California2,016 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HAROLD DAVIS, Case No. 19-cv-07650-HSG (TSH)

Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 99, 104 PINTEREST, INC., Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Harold Davis has filed a motion to compel against non-party Chairish, Inc. ECF No. 99. At issue is his subpoena that has two requests for production (“RFPs”). RFP 1 seeks “[a]ll documents and communications concerning your advertising on Pinterest, including, but not limited to, the placement of your advertisement, the manner in which your advertisement is displayed, the targeting of any specific types of images (e.g., ‘spiral staircases’) or users (e.g., ‘home décor enthusiasts’), the effectiveness of your advertisement, sales attributable to your advertising, any analytics or metrics you use or provided to you regarding your advertisement, your objectives with respect to your advertisement, any presentations made to or by you.” RFP 2 seeks “[a]ll documents and communications sufficient to show the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.