Garcia

Garcia v. Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20213:20-cv-06918California1,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIAN GARCIA, Case No. 20-cv-06918-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION Re: Doc. No. 20 SERVICES, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is a “Motion to Transfer Venue,” filed February 10, 2021, by defendants Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. and Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. (together, “Roadrunner”). Plaintiff Julian Garcia (“Garcia”) has filed opposition, to which Roadrunner has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND In the instant action, Garcia, who “worked as a Delivery Driver for [Roadrunner] from approximately 2004 or 2005 to May 2017” (see Compl. ¶ 7), alleges Roadrunner misclassified “the Delivery Drivers as ‘Independent Contractors’ rather than as ‘employees’” (see id. ¶ 31). Based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.