Edelson

Edelson v. Pogotec, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20215:21-cv-01699California2,343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 HARRY EDELSON, Case No. 21-cv-01699-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 13 POGOTEC, INC., Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Harry Edelson brings this action against defendant PogoTec, Inc. (“PogoTec”) for failure to make payments according to the terms of a promissory note. PogoTec moves to dismiss Mr. Edelson’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 13. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.1 I. BACKGROUND On July 8, 2016, Mr. Edelson and PogoTec entered into an agreement pursuant to which Mr. Edelson purchased from PogoTec a convertible promissory note for the principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “Note”). See Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 6. The complaint does not attach the Note; however, Mr. Edelson does not dispute that the document attached as Exhibit A to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.