Loeber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLTON BRYAN LOEBER, Case No. 21-cv-00505-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL;

v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

SERVICE

AMEER ALGHUSAIN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendants.

12 Pro se plaintiff Loeber and pro se defendant Alghusain consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes. See Dkt. Nos. 6, 7. Loeber named additional defendants -- AMIDAC, American Railways LLC, and General Railways LLC -- who do not appear to have been served. The consent of all named parties, including unserved defendants, is required before jurisdiction vests in a magistrate judge. Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017). Consequently, the case was reassigned to this Court. I. THE COMPLAINT The Court dismisses the complaint, Dkt. No. 1, on its own motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Choudhuri v. Specialized Loan Servicing, Case No. 3:19-cv-04198- JD, 2019 WL 3323088, at *1 (N.D. Cal. July 24, 2019). The…