Richter

Richter v. Ausmus

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20213:19-cv-08300-WHOCalifornia4,768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIA RICHTER, Case No. 19-cv-08300-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO STAY THE ACTION,

v. DENY IN PART THE MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND, AND DENY THE

LISA AUSMUS, et al., MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 79, 95, 101, 105, 109

12 Defendants Katano Kasaine, Steven Falk, the City of Oakland, Lisa Ausmus, Todd Mork, Sekou Millington, Anne Kirkpatrick, Nishant Joshi, Darren Allison, Falk, and Gregory Stanfield (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss plaintiff Julia Richter’s Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Richter opposes and moves for leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint as well as for sanctions against Stanfield and his counsel. Richter has appealed the cancellation of her industrial disability retirement application and her hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings is set for August 30, 2021 (“Hearing). For the reasons explained below, I sua sponte STAY this case pending the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.