Oster

Oster v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20215:20-cv-07828California1,745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BRENT OSTER, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 20-cv-07828-BLF

v.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

Defendants. [Re: ECF 33]

12 Before the Court is the County of Santa Clara’s Motion to Dismiss. Mot., ECF 33. The Court has determined that this motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7- 1(b). Accordingly, the hearing on the motion scheduled for October 28, 2021, is VACATED. Based on the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Brett Oster (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant complaint on November 5, 2020. See Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF 1. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the State of California (“State”), Attorney General of California, Superior Court of California, Santa Clara Superior Court, Santa Clara Family Justice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.