Doe

Doe v. San Jose Unified School District Board

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20214:20-cv-02798California1,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ELIZABETH SINCLAIR, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02798-LHK (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE JULY 12, 2021

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Re: Dkt. No. 89 BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning plaintiffs’ efforts to obtain 13 discovery regarding defendant San Jose Unified School District’s investigations, if any, of 14 defendant Peter Glasser’s alleged misconduct. Dkt. No. 89. The Court finds the matter suitable 15 for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 16 For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that the disputed discovery is 17 relevant and proportionate to the needs of the case and properly may be produced subject to an 18 appropriate protective order. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Fellowship of Christian Athletes and one of its local chapters (collectively, “FCA”) and two former student members of the local chapter, Elizabeth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.