Doe
Doe v. City Of Concord
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 20-cv-02432-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 35, 36, 37 CITY OF CONCORD, et al., Defendants.
This is a civil rights case brought by pro se plaintiff Jane Doe against the City of Concord; City of Cotati; County of Contra Costa; County of Sonoma; and certain individuals from the Concord Police Department, Cotati Police Department, Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office, and Sonoma County District Attorney’s Office. Doe has been authorized to proceed in this suit by pseudonym, Dkt. No. 33, and her first amended complaint is the operative complaint. Dkt. No. 26. The complaint alleges nine causes of action, with the four federal claims all brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (and one also under § 1985). Id. at 30-37. Federal question jurisdiction is alleged in the complaint. Id. ¶ 23. All defendants have moved to dismiss Doe’s complaint. Dkt. Nos. 34, 35, 36, 37. The complaint is dismissed with…