Greenspan

Greenspan v. Qazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20213:20-cv-03426California1,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON JACOB GREENSPAN, Case No. 20-cv-03426-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE RECUSAL AND FOURTH

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

OMAR QAZI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 129 Defendants.

12 RECUSAL REQUEST Plaintiff Greenspan’s request that the Court recuse itself under 28 U.S.C. § 455, Dkt. No. 129, is denied. The Court has written extensively about the standards of recusal and Section 455 and allied provisions. See Nat’l Abortion Fed’n v. Ctr. for Med. Progress, 257 F. Supp. 3d 1084 (N.D. Cal. 2017); Sanai v. Kozinski, Case No. 19-cv-08162-YGR (JD), 2021 WL 2273982 (N.D. Cal. May 24, 2021). Those orders are incorporated here by reference. In summary part, motions under Section 455 “are determined by the judge to whom the motion is directed.” Nat’l Abortion Fed’n, 257 F. Supp. 3d at 1088 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and United States v. Sibla, 624 F.2d 864, 867-68 (9th Cir. 1980)); see also Sanai, 2021 WL 2273982 at *2 (Section 455 motion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.