Highbaugh

Highbaugh v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20213:20-cv-03911California8,454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVERETTE HIGHBAUGH, Plaintiff, No. C 20–03911 WHA

v.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

JOSH CAITHAM, et al., MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants.

18 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff brings Section 1983 claims stemming from alleged fabrication and suppression of evidence and malicious prosecution against two detectives involved in the investigation of a murder and attempted murder for which plaintiff was tried but acquitted. Defendants move for summary judgment. For the reasons herein stated, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. STATEMENT Around 8:45 pm on November 22, 2016, Vallejo Police Department (VPD) received a 911 call from Kenesha Jackson (Rawcliffe Decl., Exh. D-2, Tr. at 2:3–7): kid’s father is at the door with the kids. I’m — it’s not a good situation for him to be knocking on this door. 2 Jackson identified the man as Everette Highbaugh, Jackson’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.