Lee v. Kitchables Products

` 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN V. LEE, Case No. 21-cv-01913-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS KITCHABLES PRODUCTS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Amazon’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 13 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 14 (“Opp.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that he purchased glass teacups manufactured by Defendant Kitchables and advertised, sold, and distributed through Amazon’s website. Dkt. No. 12 (“FAC”) ¶¶ 12-19. He further alleges that prior to selling the teacups to him, Defendants were aware that the teacups had exploded when used…