Chinitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RONALD CHINITZ, et al., Case No. 18-cv-05623-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-

DISPOSITIVE ORDER OF

INTERO REAL ESTATE SERVICES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant.

12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Intero Real Estate Services’s motion for relief from a non- dispositive pretrial order of Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72-2. See Mot., ECF 230. Intero challenges Judge Cousins’s denial of its motion to compel 16 documents in response to Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 8 and Requests for Production Nos. 6 and 9. 17 Id. 1. Intero argues that its request is not overbroad and is proportional to the needs of the case. Id. 18 2. Plaintiffs Ruby Mitchell and Edward J. Kelly oppose this motion and argue they have 19 adequately responded to the discovery requests and that additional documents sought by Intero are 20 overbroad and invasive. See Opp’n, ECF 234.…