Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20213:17-cv-05659California3,067 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, No. C 17-05659 WHA
v.
ORDER ADOPTING SPECIAL
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., MASTER’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION FOR
Defendant. ATTORNEY’S FEES
15 16 17 INTRODUCTION Both parties in this patent infringement action object to the special master’s report and recommendation regarding attorney’s fees and costs. Because the objections concern only the scope of the fees, which was previously determined by the district court, this order ADOPTS the special master’s report and recommendation in its entirety. Defendant’s motion for sanctions is DENIED. STATEMENT A prior order details the facts of this suit (Fees Order, Dkt. No. 648). Patent owner, Finjan, Inc., asserted two patents, among others, against Juniper Networks, Inc.: United States Patent Nos. 6,804,780 (“the ’780 patent”) and 8,677,494 (“the ’494 patent”). In June 2018, for an early…