Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20213:17-cv-05659California3,067 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, No. C 17-05659 WHA

v.

ORDER ADOPTING SPECIAL

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., MASTER’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION FOR

Defendant. ATTORNEY’S FEES

15 16 17 INTRODUCTION Both parties in this patent infringement action object to the special master’s report and recommendation regarding attorney’s fees and costs. Because the objections concern only the scope of the fees, which was previously determined by the district court, this order ADOPTS the special master’s report and recommendation in its entirety. Defendant’s motion for sanctions is DENIED. STATEMENT A prior order details the facts of this suit (Fees Order, Dkt. No. 648). Patent owner, Finjan, Inc., asserted two patents, among others, against Juniper Networks, Inc.: United States Patent Nos. 6,804,780 (“the ’780 patent”) and 8,677,494 (“the ’494 patent”). In June 2018, for an early…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.