Clancy

Clancy v. Mancuso

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20213:21-cv-00682California1,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 NORMAN CLANCY, Case No. 21-cv-00682-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS; DISMISSING ACTION;

v. DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

JERRY MANCUSO, et al., Defendants.

13 Before the Court is defendant Gerald Bittner, Jr., D.D.S.'s ("Dr. Bittner") "Motions to (1) Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and/or Failure to State a Claim, and/or (2) Strike Prayers for Punitive Damages and Attorney's Fees," filed May 19, 2021. Also before the Court is defendant Jerry Mancuso, D.D.S.'s ("Dr. Mancuso") "Motion to Dismiss," filed May 28, 2021. Plaintiff Norman Clancy ("Clancy"), who proceeds pro se, has filed a single opposition, to which Dr. Bittner has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court deems the matters suitable for determination on the parties' respective written submission,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.