Kurisu

Kurisu v. Svenhard Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20213:20-cv-06409California7,825 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KERRY KURISU, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06409-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. KOHLES’S MOTION TO DISMISS

AND GRANTING IN PART AND

SVENHARD SWEDISH BAKERY DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS

SUPPLEMENTAL KEY MANAGEMENT SVENHARD AND KUNKEL’S

RETIREMENT PLAN, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. Docket Nos. 27,

13 14 Plaintiffs Kerry Kurisu, Douglas Prola, and Bill Pruitt are former employees of Svenhard’s Swedish Bakery (“Swedish Bakery”). They have filed an ERISA action against multiple defendants, asserting, inter alia, a claim for pension benefits. Defendants are (1) the Svenhard’s Swedish Bakery Supplemental Key Management Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) and (2) Ronny Svenhard, David Kunkel, James Kohles, and Michelle Barnett (the “Individual Defendants”), each of whom is allegedly a plan administrator and/or fiduciary of the Plan.1 Currently pending before the Court are two motions to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.