Stokes
Stokes v. U.S. Department of Justice
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTON STOKES, Plaintiff, No. C 19-04613 WHA
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS
OF JUSTICE, THE ATTORNEY FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.
16 INTRODUCTION A federal statute imposes a lifetime ban on possession of a firearm for anyone “who has been committed to a mental institution,” a statutory term requiring “robust judicial involvement,” according to our court of appeals. In the instant case, a teenager got high and, after a 72-hour treatment, medical personnel “certified” him for a further fourteen-day residential treatment. No judge was ever involved. Decades later, he now wishes to inherit two firearms from his grandfather. This order holds that the “certification” did not (and does not) bar him from possessing the firearms because it did not constitute a “commitment” within the meaning of the federal statute. Therefore, summary judgment for…