Duran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANGELA DURAN, Case No. 20-cv-09025-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE REMAND

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 19 ALLEGIS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Duran, on behalf of herself and a putative class of current and former warehouse workers, sued defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Best Buy Warehousing Logistics, Inc. (Best Buy), and affiliated parties, for a variety of wage and hour claims under California state law. Dkt. No. 1- 2. The complaint was originally filed in the San Francisco Superior Court, and was removed by Adecco under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). Dkt. No. 1. Duran says the case should be remanded because Adecco’s notice of removal did not plausibly demonstrate the CAFA elements of minimum diversity of citizenship, or a reasonable likelihood that the amount in controversy is at least $5 million. Dkt. No. 19 at 8-9. Adecco opposes a remand on the grounds that both requirements have been established. See Dkt. No.…