Hooker
Hooker v. Atchley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MAURICE WILLIAM HOOKER, Case No. 21-cv-04228-VC (PR)
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSING ONE CLAIM,
v. ISSUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ON TWO CLAIMS
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, Re: Dkt. No. 2 Respondent.
Maurice William Hooker is a state prisoner who has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state court conviction and sentence. His application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Hooker asserts three claims: (1) his lengthy sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment; (2) the restitution portion of his sentence constitutes cruel and usual punishment; and (3) ineffective assistance of counsel. Hooker’s contention that the restitution portion of his sentence is unconstitutional must be dismissed because there is no habeas jurisdiction over a challenge to a restitution order. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 a habeas petition may be entertained “only on the ground that [petitioner] is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States,” which requires “a nexus…