Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Capella Photonics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20213:20-cv-01858California1,985 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-01858-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING

v. DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VACATE

CAPELLA PHOTONICS, INC., INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS Defendant. Docket No. 122

12 13 This case involves two patents that Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Capella Photonics, Inc. (“Capella”) accuses Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) of infringing. The parties have reached a settlement of the dispute, and Capella has now filed an unopposed motion to vacate two orders: (1) an order granting Cisco’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, issued on August 21, 2020, concluding that Capella could not seek damages for alleged infringement that took place prior to the reissue of the relevant patents, Docket No. 48; and (2) a claim construction order, issued on April 29, 2021, largely adopting the constructions proposed by Capella, Docket No. 119, (collectively, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.