Matias Rauda v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20213:21-cv-05734California2,779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 WILLIAN MATIAS RAUDA, Case No. 21-cv-05734-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

AND PETITION FOR A WRIT OF

MERRICK B GARLAND, et al., MANDAMUS Defendants.

Willian Matias Rauda petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus and moves for a temporary restraining order. Mr. Matias’s petition and motion seek the same basic relief: an order requiring Defendants (the Attorney General, the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, and the Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)) to instruct the BIA to adjudicate Mr. Matias’s motion to reopen immigration proceedings by August 13, 2021. The Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary and denies Mr. Matias’s petition and his motion for a TRO. I. BACKGROUND The Court has provided more detailed facts in its order denying Mr. Matias’s previous motion for a TRO in a related case. See Case No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.