Siqueiros

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAUL SIQUEIROS, et al., Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

GENERAL MOTORS LLC, Docket No. 324 Defendant.

12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant General Motors LLC’s (“GM’s”) motion for reconsideration. See Docket No. 324 (“Mot.”). For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In its May 25, 2021 order, the Court held that immediate or direct privity of contract is not required to bring a claim under the Idaho Consumer Protection Act (ICPA). See Docket No. 320 (“Order”) at 9. Instead, Idaho Plaintiffs need only show that their ICPA claims are “founded on a contract, not that the contract must be one entered into directly by the plaintiff and the defendant [i.e., GM].” Id. (emphases added) (citing In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg., Sales Pracs., & Prod. Liab. Litig. (“FCA”), 295 F. Supp. 3d…