Prescott

Prescott v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20215:20-cv-02101California1,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 STEVEN PRESCOTT, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02101-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE JULY 23, 2021

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

DEFENDANT’S DISCOVERY

RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 102 Defendant.

13 Plaintiffs and defendant Reckitt Benckiser LLC (“RB”) ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning RB’s document requests. Dkt. No. 102. The Court deems this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The parties raise disputes about three separate matters: (1) plaintiffs’ counsel’s advertisements soliciting consumers of the products at issue, (2) documents RB subpoenaed from TexTest, and (3) plaintiffs’ communications with Procter & Gamble (“P&G”) regarding plaintiffs’ document subpoena. The Court addresses each dispute below.1 1. RB’s Request for Production No. 37 (Prescott) - advertisements RB requests production of “all documents relating to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.