Saddozai

Saddozai v. Carwithen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20215:21-cv-01352California788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

Case No. 21-01352 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. RECUSAL; SUA SPONTE GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

A. CARWITHEN, et al.,

Defendants.

(Docket No. 11)

17 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on events that took place at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) where he is currently confined. Dkt. No. 1. On June 30, 2021, the Court dismissed the original complaint with leave to amend, such that Plaintiff had until July 28, 2021, to file an amended complaint. Id. at 12. He has not done so. Plaintiff has filed a “preemptory challenge and disqualification of judge pursuant o CCP §§ 170.6; 170.6(a)6; 1141.8; 1141.18(d); and Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 144; 455.” Dkt. No. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.