San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20213:21-cv-02566California11,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER,

Case No. 21-cv-02566-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE AND MOTION TO

UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE DISMISS

SERVICE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 15 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Baykeeper”) brings this action against the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“the Service”); Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of the Service; and Debra Haaland (“the Secretary”), in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States of the Interior (collectively, “Federal Defendants”). Baykeeper alleges that Federal Defendants violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) by arbitrarily and capriciously finding under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) that: (1) listing of the Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) (San Francisco Bay-Delta distinct vertebrate population segment)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.