Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Reynoso

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20213:21-cv-02950California226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 21-cv-02950-AGT Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

MARTHA LETICIA REYNOSO, Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendant. 1] L

Before the Court is Richard Sepulveda’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint

14 |] to add Itzel Reynoso, who 1s identified as the daughter of current defendant Martha Reynoso, as a

|| defendant. Dkt. 11. Martha Reynoso has not filed an opposition (and her deadline to do so has © 16 |] passed) and the Court finds that justice would be served by allowing the proposed amendment.

|| See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (“The court should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so Z || requires.”); Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (“In the absence of any apparent or || declared reason .. . the leave sought should, as the rules require, be ‘freely given.’”). Sepulveda’s || unopposed motion is therefore granted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.