Sepulveda
Sepulveda v. Reynoso
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 21-cv-02950-AGT Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
MARTHA LETICIA REYNOSO, Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendant. 1] L
Before the Court is Richard Sepulveda’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint
14 |] to add Itzel Reynoso, who 1s identified as the daughter of current defendant Martha Reynoso, as a
|| defendant. Dkt. 11. Martha Reynoso has not filed an opposition (and her deadline to do so has © 16 |] passed) and the Court finds that justice would be served by allowing the proposed amendment.
|| See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (“The court should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so Z || requires.”); Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (“In the absence of any apparent or || declared reason .. . the leave sought should, as the rules require, be ‘freely given.’”). Sepulveda’s || unopposed motion is therefore granted. …