IN RE PFA INSURANCE MARKETING LITIGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CASE NO. 4:18-cv-03771 YGR

IN RE PFA INSURANCE MARKETING AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART

LITIGATION AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF

Re: Dkt. No. 211

Now before the Court is plaintiffs’ administrative motion to extend the discovery cut-off, which currently is August 6, 2021, for two purposes. Docket No. 211. Defendant Premier Financial Alliance, Inc. opposes the motion. Docket No. 212. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part. I. LEGAL STANDARD A case “schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “Rule 16(b)’s ‘good cause’ standard primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the amendment.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). “Although the existence or degree of prejudice to the party opposing the modification might supply…