Cheyssial

Cheyssial v. Wormuth

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20213:20-cv-03214California5,726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CATHERINE MARY CHEYSSIAL, Case No. 20-cv-03214-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND SETTING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

RYAN D. MCCARTHY, Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendant.

12 Pro se plaintiff Catherine M. Cheyssial filed this action against defendant Ryan D. McCarthy, Secretary of the Army, alleging age and disability discrimination and retaliation. Before me is McCarthy’s motion to dismiss on grounds that this action is untimely and, alternatively, that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim for discrimination based on a protected class covered by Title VII. Cheyssial alleges that she did not receive actual notice of the November 13, 2019 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) decision until January 28, 2020 and that her initial Complaint in this court was mailed on February 27, 2020, within the statutory deadline, but was rejected as a defective pleading. Taking these allegations as true, and liberally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.