Whitaker

Whitaker v. Surf and Turf, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20213:21-cv-03100California3,209 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 21-cv-03100-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND STRIKE

SURF AND TURF, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Brian Whitaker brings this case under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, asserting that Defendant Surf and Turf, LLC (“Surf & Turf”) failed to provide wheelchair-accessible facilities. Surf & Turf moves to dismiss Whitaker’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and, in the alternative, asks the Court to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim and dismiss it under Rule 12(b)(1) or to strike that claim under Rule 12(f) for failure to comply with California’s procedural requirements for high-frequency litigants. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing previously set …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.