Farr
Farr v. Acima Credit, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SIEARA FARR, CASE NO. 20-CV-8619-YGR
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE
vs. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
ACIMA CREDIT LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 52 Defendant.
9 The Court is in receipt of plaintiff’s administrative motion to extend the deadline for filing 10 her motion for reconsideration of the July 7, 2021 Order granting defendant’s motion to deny class 11 certification. (Dkt. No. 52.) “The extension is requested so that Plaintiff can conduct focused 12 discovery relevant to the motion for reconsideration, i.e., discovery concerning whether Acima 13 itself uses remedies specified in Row 11 of its Arbitration Clause separate and apart from 14 arbitration proceedings.” (Id.) Plaintiff’s request is DENIED, as she has not adequately 15 demonstrated why such discovery is relevant to her proposed interpretation of the Arbitration 16 Clause. 17 Contrary to plaintiff’s reading, the Court did not hold that remedies of Row…