Bally

Bally v. State Farm Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20213:18-cv-04954California1,016 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ELIZABETH A. BALLY, Case No. 18-cv-04954-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE A CROSS-

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE JUDGMENT ON COUNT TWO

COMPANY,

12 Defendant.

14 On April 28, 2021, the Court issued its Order on Cross-Motions for Summary 15 Judgment (“Order”) (dkt. 222). In relevant part, the Order denied State Farm summary 16 judgment with respect to the claim for breach of contract based on the monthly expense 17 provision (“Count II”). Order at 20. Plaintiff did not move for summary judgment on 18 Count II. The Court subsequently granted Plaintiff leave to move for summary judgment 19 on Count II, and Plaintiff moved for summary judgment on Count II on June 30, 2021. 20 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (dkt. 237). On July 27, 2021, State Farm filed a 21 motion for leave to file a cross-motion for summary judgment on Count II. Motion for 22 Leave (“Motion”) (dkt. 239). Because State Farm has not shown good cause for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.