Love

Love v. Barcelino Continental Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20213:19-cv-06684California2,478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 19-cv-06684-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BARCELINO CONTINENTAL CORP., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendant.

12 Samuel Love filed suit against Barcelino Continental Corp., alleging disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Act. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 42.) The motion is fully briefed. (Dkt. Nos. 43, 44.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the August 12, 2021 hearing, and GRANTS the motion for the reasons explained below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a paraplegic who cannot walk and uses a wheelchair for mobility. (Dkt. No. 43- 2 ¶ 2.) Defendant owns and operates the Barcelino’s Men’s Clothing Store in the Hillsdale Mall at 177…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.