In Re Pacific Fertility Center Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20213:18-cv-01586California1,705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER

LITIGATION Case No. 18-cv-01586-JSC

Re: A.B., C.D., E.D., G.H., and I.J

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(B) Re: Dkt. No. 883

12 Plaintiffs A.B., C.D., E.F., G.H., and IJ prevailed at trial on their product liability and failure to recall claims against Chart Industries. Because Plaintiffs also brought claims against Pacific Fertility Center, Prelude, and Pacific MSO (the “PFC entities”) which have been stayed pending arbitration, this action remains pending and judgment was not entered following the jury’s verdict on Plaintiffs’ claims against Chart. Plaintiffs now move for entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) arguing that there is no just reason to delay entry of judgment on their claims against Chart pending arbitration of their claims against the remaining Defendants. (Dkt. No. 883.) Having considered the parties’ briefs,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.