Shirriel

Shirriel v. Bloomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20215:21-cv-02591California1,718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRONE SHIRRIEL,

Case No. 21-02591 EJD (PR) Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AS MOOT

BLOOMFIELD, Warden,

Respondent.

(Docket No. 3)

17 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the denial of parole based on an unconstitutional disciplinary hearing. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Dkt. No. 8. He has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 3. 22 DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review This court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.