Bryant

Bryant v. City of Antioch

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20213:21-cv-00590California5,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARRIYANNA BRYANT, Case No. 21-cv-00590-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 19 CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants City of Antioch (“City”), Officer Robert Gerber (“Gerber”), Officer Eric McManus (“McManus”), and Officer Jason Vanderpool (“Vanderpool”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 19) Plaintiff Mariyanna Bryant’s (“Bryant”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 11. Bryant filed an Opposition (ECF No. 20) and Defendants filed a Reply. ECF No. 23. Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following allegations in Bryant’s FAC, as also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.