Maxwell

Maxwell v. Kaylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20215:19-cv-07832California788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 MICHAEL T. MAXWELL, Case No. 19-CV-07832-LHK 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR CORRECTIVE v.

ORDERS AND MOTION TO ALTER

OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT

ROY KAYLOR,

15 Defendant.

Note: Plaintiff has requested an accommodation for his visual handicap “that requires larger and bold type fonts.” Compl. at 1. The Court will file as an exhibit to the instant 18 order a copy of the order that uses larger type and bold fonts. 19 Before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff Michael Maxwell (“Plaintiff”): (1) a 20 motion for corrective orders, and (2) a motion to alter or amend the judgment. ECF Nos. 99, 109. 21 For the reasons explained below, the Court denies both motions. 22 On March 22, 2021, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice and entered 23 judgment in favor of Defendant Roy Kaylor. ECF Nos. 92, 93. On April 13, 2021, after judgment 24 had been entered, Plaintiff filed a motion for corrective orders requesting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.